Legal Opinion
Quilter v. Voinovich
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 10, 1992No. 5:91 CV 2219PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On January 31, 1992, this Court filed its opinion and order holding that there is no legal mandate requiring the creation of majority-minority districts wherever possible in the 1991 Apportionment Plan for the Ohio General Assembly (the Plan). Furthermore, this Court found that the Apportionment Board had not conducted a totality of the circumstances analysis sufficient to establish a violation of the Voting Rights Act and justify the majority-minori*757ty districts delineated in the Plan. The Board was ordered to reconsider the Plan and either show justification under the totality of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beens v. ErdahlDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
3Cited by11 opinions
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- State ex rel. Rogers v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.