Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Beens v. Erdahl

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1972No. 4-71-Civil 151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND PLAN OF APPORTIONMENT ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

2Per curiam

THE COURT’S REAPPORTIONMENT PLAN

Pursuant to a remand from the United States Supreme Court, we have reapportioned the State of Minnesota into sixty-seven (67) Senate districts and one hundred and thirty-four (134) House districts with one (1) senator and one (1) representative to be elected from each district. We have followed the criteria set forth in our Orders of November 26, 1971, and January 25, 1972, 336 F.Supp. 715, in performing this task.

The controlling description of each Senate and House district is set…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Beens v. ErdahlDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  2. Parsons v. HickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Chapman v. MeierDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1974
  5. Chapman v. MeierDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API