Legal Opinion

Quilter v. Voinovich

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 11, 1995No. 5:91 CV 2219PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

OPINION

The question before this court is whether the Ohio Apportionment Board’s consideration of race in its 1992 redistricting plan violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We hold that by virtue of demonstrated white and African American coalitional voting for legislative seats in Ohio, and the failure of Defendants to' demonstrate a compelling state interest for using race as the predominant factor in drawing legislative lines, certain districts in the 1992 plan are unconstitutional.

I. Background and Procedural History

Pursuant to the Ohio Constitution, the State…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clark v. Calhoun County, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996
  3. Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. King v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. King v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API