Legal Opinion

City of Wilmington v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 2008No. COA07-11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

The City of Wilmington (“plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s order and judgment granting the motion to dismiss filed by Broadus E. Hill, III (“defendant”), and declaring unconstitutional the first sentence of Wilmington Land Development Code (“WLDC”), section 18-285(g). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

On 21 July 2004, defendant applied for a building permit to build a garage apartment on property he owned at 303 McMillan Avenue. He was notified 20 July 2005 that his property was in violation of WLDC section 18. Plaintiff gave defendant until 20 August 2005 to bring…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Town of Hillsborough v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re S.D.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Cully's Motorcross Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Tirpak v. Borough of Point Pleasant Beach Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. MARIA I. TIRPAK VS. BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-2918-17, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. MBSC Property South LLC v. Myrtle Beach South Carolina, The City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API