Legal Opinion
Southern Ry. Co. v. Order of Ry. Conductors of America
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 13, 1947No. 15913PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FishburnE, AJ.:
This action was instituted against the defendant by Southern Railway Company in July, •1945, under the declaratory judgment Act of this state, Code Section 660, for the purpose of obtaining a construction of a written contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, Order of Railway Conductors of America. The question presented by the complaint is whether certain industrial switching movements at the plant of the Ancor Corporation at Pregnall, South Carolina, an intermediate point on plaintiff’s railroad line between Charleston and Branchville, are part of the service trips of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.