Legal Opinion
William H. Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1968No. 9689PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
This is a suit on a builder’s risk insurance policy. There is here questioned the validity of the district court’s orders permitting amendment of a removal petition to more adequately allege diversity jurisdiction and, following such amendment, granting summary judgment in favor of the insurance company on the grounds that at the time of the fire loss the building was not insured because it theretofore had been “occupied”, and was “completed”.
The action initially was brought by appellant Hendrix in a New Mexico state court. His complaint recited that he was a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Parker v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Temple Hoyne Buell v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Bradford v. Mitchell Brothers Truck LinesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert LeathermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Northern Illinois Gas Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Airco Industrial Gases, a Division of Airco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Preston v. Tenet Healthsystem Memorial Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Barrow Development Company, Inc. v. The Fulton Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.