Legal Opinion
Barrow Development Company, Inc. v. The Fulton Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1969No. 22791_1PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal in a civil action brought in the Superior Court of the State of Alaska and removed, on the ground of the diverse citizenship of the parties (28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1)), to the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. Appellee — defendant below — prompted by our question concerning the sufficiency of the showing of diversity, now seeks leave to amend the removal petition (28 U.S.C. § 1446), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653 which provides that “defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended, upon terms, in the trial or appellate court.” 1…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- William H. Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Temple Hoyne Buell v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Bradford v. Mitchell Brothers Truck LinesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert LeathermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Libhart v. Santa Monica Dairy Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Northern Illinois Gas Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Airco Industrial Gases, a Division of Airco, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Libhart v. Santa Monica Dairy Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.