Legal Opinion

Trull v. Lason Systems, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 4, 1997No. 97 C 855PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Lisa Trull originally filed this putative class action against two defendants, Lason Systems, Inc) and Arrow Services Bureau, alleging numerous Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA” or “Act”) violations. On the heels of Trull’s motion for class certification, defendant Lason moved for summary judgment, contending that it cannot be hable under the FDCPA because it is not a “debt collector” covered by the Act. While these motions were pending, defendant Arrow Services was dismissed from the ease, leaving Lason as the sole…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Thomas FLAHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patricia White, on Her Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerome GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Kate Schweizer, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Gradisher v. Check Enforcement Unit, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. Randle v. GC Services, L.P.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  5. Crawford v. Senex Law, P.C.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API