Legal Opinion
Kate Schweizer, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Trans Union Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 26, 1998No. 97-7542PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Kate Schweizer appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles L. Brieant, J., granting summary judgment to defendant Trans Union Corporation (“Trans Union”) on Schweizer’s claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.
Schweizer’s claim is based on a collection notice that she received from Trans Union in July 1995 regarding a debt of $15 allegedly owed by Schweizer to Roche Biomedical Labs, Inc. Schweizer does not challenge the content of the letter. Rather, she…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Christ Clomon v. Philip D. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi CollectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Diane W. Bentley v. Great Lakes Collection BureauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Carmel A. Gallagher v. George J. Delaney, Robert A. Hansen, and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Campuzano-Burgos v. Midland Credit Management., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Foti v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Arias v. Gutman, Mintz, Baker & Sonnenfeldt LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.