Legal Opinion

Terry v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1896No. 1,810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.

We learn, from the special verdict, that appellant was a section hand in appellee’s employ. While on his way to work, with the rest of the gang, they found a caboose standing upon the main *354track, along which their hand-car was moving. The foreman passed along south of the caboose, and then ordered the men, including appellant, to immediately pick up the hand-car, which was heavily loaded, and carry it around the caboose. The ground, at "this side of the track, was unlevel and uneven, with snags and stubs protruding out of the ground to a height of six or eight inches, as was plainly visible…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Becknell v. HosierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Walkup v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CostelloIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wabash Railroad v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Roundenbush v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hartzell v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API