Legal Opinion

Van Houten v. Better Health Ins.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 1964No. 5-3384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

The appellant brought this action against the appellee to recover $4,739.28 for benefits allegedly due on three family group insurance contracts issued by the appellee. The appellee answered by a general denial. The jury rendered its verdict for the appellee. From a judgment entered accordingly the appellant brings this appeal.'

The policies in question, containing the applications for insurance, were introduced into evidence by the appellant. Paragraph nine of the application provides that any falsity in the application barred recovery “if made with the intent to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  2. Sloan v. AyresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Abel of Ark. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Bridges v. Harold L. Schaefer, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  5. Parker v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beam v. Monsanto Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Insured Lloyds v. MayoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Higgins v. BlankenshipCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Tucker v. DurhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API