Insured Lloyds v. Mayo

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellant insurance company seeks reversal of an adverse judgment in a suit by one of its insured for an automobile collision loss. The only dispute between the parties was the amount to which appellee was entitled under the policy. Appellant states three points for reversal, to wit:

I. The jury’s verdict was contrary to the law and to the evidence.

II. The trial court committed reversible error in giving instruction no. four.

III. The trial court committed reversible error in refusing to grant a mistrial for the improper remarks of counsel for plaintiff in his opening…