Legal Opinion

Lent v. McIntosh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1947No. 30268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an appeal by defendants Earl T. McIntosh and wife from a judgment entered on February 25, 1947, in favor of plaintiff, Albert H. Lent. In this opinion, Earl T. McIntosh will be referred to as the sole defendant.

The questions raised on, the appeal pertain to certain claimed representations made by defendant to plaintiff, relative to a tractor with a bulldozer attachment which McIntosh sold Lent under a conditional sale contract. The gist of the complaint is that on January 8, 1946, defendant represented to plaintiff that he was the owner of a diesel caterpillar tractor, model RD-8,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Jones v. MallonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Smith v. BolsterWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Getty v. Jett Ross Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nakanishi v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. McDonald Credit Service, Inc. v. ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Northwest Collectors, Inc. v. GerritsenWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API