Legal Opinion

Getty v. Jett Ross Mines, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1945No. 29497PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, C. J.

Plaintiffs, R. P. Getty and L. H. House, jointly purchased from defendant Jett Ross Mines, Inc., a corporation, a Northwest dragline shovel, a large machine used for excavating, for moving dirt or gravel, or as a crane. Charles L. Ross at all times herein mentioned, was president of defendant corporation, which purchased the “drag-line,” as we shall call it, in 1935 for a sum between twelve and thirteen thousand dollars. When purchased, the machine was new with the exception of the base, which had been rebuilt at the factory.

During the summers of 1935-1936, the corporation used the dragline…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bonded Adjustment Co. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Clark v. RallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Keylon v. InchWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lambert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Fines v. West Side Implement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WASH. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lent v. McIntoshWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Of Washington v. Diego TavaresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API