Legal Opinion

Berg v. Stromme

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1971No. 41500Published

1Opinion of the Court

79 Wn.2d 184 (1971)

484 P.2d 380

RICHARD BERG, Petitioner,

v.

ARTHUR STROMME et al., Respondents.

No. 41500.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 22, 1971.

HALE, J.

Plaintiff bought a new Pontiac station wagon automobile but claimed that it had so many things wrong with it he felt justified in rescinding the deal. When he tried to return the car and get a refund, the dealer refused, saying not only that the sale carried no warranty of quality but that plaintiff had in writing waived all warranties of fitness, express or implied, and had acknowledged that he was buying without any guarantee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. House v. ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API