Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1937No. 26410PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph Hudziecko claimed that on October 5, 1926, in the course of his employment he received injuries consisting of a severe strain of his back and kidneys, resulting in traumatic nephritis. The self-insuring employer having refused to pay compensation, and, an application for compensation under Section 1465-74, General Code, as well as upon rehearing, having been denied by the Industrial Commission, an appeal was perfected to the Common Pleas Court. A jury found the employee was entitled to participate in the workmen's compensation fund. The Court of Appeals affirmed and remanded the cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State ex rel. Hess v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State ex rel. Shelley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Stahl v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API