Legal Opinion
Bates v. Rosique
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 21, 2001No. 3D00-1153PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
777 So.2d 980 (2001)
Paul E. BATES, et al., Appellants,
v.
Javier ROSIQUE, et al., Appellees.
No. 3D00-1153.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 21, 2001.
Goldstein & Tanen and Susan E. Trench, Miami, for appellants.
William J. Berger (Boca Raton), for appellees.
Before LEVY, GODERICH, and SHEVIN, JJ.
LEVY, Judge.
Paul E. Bates, et al. ("Buyers") appeal from a lower court Order entering Partial Summary Judgment in favor of Javier Rosique, et al. ("Sellers") on the basis that Buyers' fraudulent inducement claims were barred by the Economic Loss Rule. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas CostarricensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Hotels of Key Largo, Inc. v. RHI HOTELSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Pressman v. WolfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Clayton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Tevini v. Roscioli Yacht Sales, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Excess Risk Underwriters, Inc. v. Lafayette Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Rosa v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Topp, Inc. v. Uniden America Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- GFI Acquisition, LLC v. American Federated Title Corp. (In Re a & M Florida Properties II, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- General Electric Co. v. Latin American Imports, S.A.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.