Whitley v. Klauber
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFuchsberg, J.
Most respectfully, I suggest the result reached by the majority brooks legal and economic realty. In my view, it is premised on an unsound definition of what is a “return of capital”. Remove that erroneous assumption and the argument it advances collapses like a house of cards.
A few simple principles will point up my position. Essentially, the capital of a limited partnership, like that of a corporation, consists of the contributions subscribed or paid in, in the one case by its partners and in the other by its shareholders. The amounts for which either of these classes *579of investors is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Lichtyger v. Franchard Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Johns v. JaebCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- M. & C. Creditors Corp. v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Kittredge v. LangleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.