Legal Opinion
Lichtyger v. Franchard Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1966PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
The plaintiffs-appellants, who sue “ on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated ’ ’, are 31 limited partners with $202,500 invested in a real estate syndicate, River View Associates, of which the defendants Siegel and Young are the general partners.1 River View is the owner in fee of the Sheraton Motor Inn in New York City, a motel in whose financing and operation the corporate defendants were all involved. The gravamen of the amended complaint is that, ‘ ‘ in wanton dis*532regard of the interests of the limited partners of River View, and in breach of their fiduciary obligations…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Robinson v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Stratton Oakmont, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.