Legal Opinion

Johns v. Jaeb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1974No. 18403PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Justice.

In this suit to recover usury penalties, the principal question is whether defendant advanced funds to plaintiff as a loan or as a contribution to a limited partnership of which plaintiff was the general partner. The transaction was in the form of a limited partnership and an agreement of plaintiff to purchase defendant’s interest in the supposed limited partnership. Since plaintiff was unconditionally obligated to repay in monthly installments the entire amount advanced plus a fixed sum, we hold that the transaction was in substance a loan. Accordingly, we reverse the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Southwestern Investment Co. v. Hockley County Seed & Delinting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Jackson v. CassidyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Guetersloh v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. WE Grace Manufacturing Company v. LevinTexas Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Haskell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  2. Grotjohn Precise Connexiones International, S.A. v. JEM Financial, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  3. Armando Fong Najarro and Compania Financiera Libano, S.A. v. Sasi International, Ltd., and Suzanne FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. West, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  5. Commerce, Crowdus & Canton, Ltd. v. DKS Construction Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API