Legal Opinion

McClave v. Moulton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1941No. 2280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between two automobiles, which was tried to the court without intervention of a jury, findings of fact and conclusions of law made and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff (appellee) against defendant (appellant) from which an appeal has been prosecuted.

A hard-surfaced north and south through highway, designated as Highway No. 14, intersected at right angles by an east and west dirt road, was protected from east or west traffic on said dirt road by stop signs, the sign on the east being…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Smith v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Buckeye Irrigation Co. v. AskrenArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mayhew ex rel. Mayhew v. DeCourseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Nevitt v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. First Sec. Bank of Utah, N.A. United States v. Allen. United States v. Cota (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  2. James Stafos v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. James StafosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  4. Viehweg v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API