Legal Opinion

Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1959No. 6016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The question in this diversity action is whether a retail vendor of a chattel manufactured by another is liable for injuries to a borrower of the chattel from the purchaser when such injuries result from the failure of the chattel because of a latent defect.

Appellee-defendant, Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc., at its Kansas City, Kansas, retail store sold to one Verbanie a 16-foot extension ladder manufactured by Pat Johnson Mfg. Co. Without having used the ladder in an extended position, Verbanie loaned it to his neighbor, appellant-plaintiff Burgess, who used it…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  5. Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert Fred Swearngin v. Sears Roebuck & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  2. Coyne v. John S. Tilley Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Lockett v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Long v. Flanigan Warehouse CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. McMeekin v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API