Legal Opinion

Buckeye Irrigation Co. v. Askren

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1935No. Civil No. 3475PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action by the personal representative of the estate of Carl Askren for damages on account of his death, alleged to have been caused by and through the negligence of the defendant, Buckeye Irrigation Company. Under an agreement of the parties, a jury was waived and the case was tried before the court, two Judges, Honorable M. T. PHELPS and Honorable J. C. NILES, sitting. The issues upon the trial were decided in favor of the defendant, and thereafter plaintiff made a motion for a new trial. From an order granting this motion, the defendant has appealed.

The grounds of the motion for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. ComptonArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Salladay v. Old Dominion Copper Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. Citizens' State Bk.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. MacNeil v. PerkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Clark v. Quality Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. FloydArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. HOFF EX REL. HOFF v. Natural Refining Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Spur Feeding Company v. FernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API