Legal Opinion

Mayhew ex rel. Mayhew v. DeCoursey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1932No. 30,410PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for damages growing out of a collision of a truck with an automobile. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

The facts are as follows: Appellants operate a plant where they manufacture ice cream. As part of this business they delivered ice cream to various customers in Kansas City. To do this they operate a truck. The evidence in the case speaks of it as a ton-and-a-half truck. Appellee worked for appellants as a helper on this truck during the day from seven in the morning till six in the evening. From six in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. ScanlonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. O'Leary v. FashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. City of Kansas City v. SlangstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Kemp v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Pinson v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Klatt v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Morris v. Dame'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Tilden v. AshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Dye v. RuleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Ruff v. Farley Machine Works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API