Franklin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHornby, J.
The principal question presented by this appeal from convictions for the sale of narcotics is whether the defendant was denied the right of confrontation as the result of an informer invoking the privilege against self-incrimination. An additional question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence.
On an evening in February 1964 an officer of the Baltimore City narcotics squad and an informer went to a bar on West Saratoga Street. On entering, the informer engaged in a conversation with the defendant. Shortly thereafter the officer and informer left, went to the parked automobile of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Royal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Snead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.