Legal Opinion

Snead v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1964No. [No. 213, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.

Convicted (as a third offender) in three cases of the sale, possession, and control of a narcotic drug, the appellant, Snead, claims here that the evidence showed that he was entrapped by a federal narcotics officer and a police informer, and that he was not the seller, but the agent of the narcotics officer in purchasing the drug, so that his sale, possession and control were those of the officer.

The State’s evidence was as follows. On the first occasion the narcotics agent and the informer drove to the home of the appellant in Baltimore City, where the informer brought the appellant out and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. United States v. James William PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Lane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Whyte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Fisher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Sparks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API