Legal Opinion

Smallwood v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 6, 1990No. 141, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

In this case we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred when it refused to allow cross-examination of a *302witness as to the outcome of charges she had-filed against Petitioner on two previous occasions. Because we believe that the questions were intended to uncover prejudice, and bias on. the part of the witness, we conclude that it was reversible, error for the court to prohibit cross-examination on this point.

The circumstances surrounding the crime and Petitioner’s prosecution are essential to an understanding of the context in which the cross-examination was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Richardson v. McGriffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API