Legal Opinion

Royal v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 11, 1964No. [No. 33, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The principal question presented by appellate counsel for the defendant (Doyle D. Royal) on this appeal from convictions of armed robbery and for carrying a deadly weapon relates to the propriety of the trial court allowing codefendants to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. Additional questions concern the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdicts of guilty, the failure of the court to caution the jury that it should not draw an unfavorable presumption or inference against the defendant because the codefendants refused to testify, and the refusal of the court to quash…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Adams, Nelson, and Timanus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. Butz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Forrester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Stanley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API