Legal Opinion

In re Hoeniger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Berthold H. Hoeniger was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on December 4, 1950. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department. Respondent is also admitted to practice law in Connecticut.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (iii) on the basis of uncontested evidence of professional misconduct which…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re MuraskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re AdelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re PantojaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HoenigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API