In re Muraskin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent David V. Muraskin was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on Febru*187ary 25, 1974, as David Van Muraskin. At all times relevant to these proceedings, he maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) seeks an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (iii) and (iv) immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law, based upon uncontested evidence that respondent has engaged in professional misconduct and respondent’s failure or refusal…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In re CrispinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re GallancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re ChanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re WallmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Board of Professional Responsibility of The Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Loring Edwin JusticeTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
- In re KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re BermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re BoterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re FishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.