Legal Opinion

In re Hoeniger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Berthold H. Hoeniger was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on December 4, 1950. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

By order entered November 28, 2006 (Matter of Hoeniger, 36 AD3d 268 [2006]), this Court immediately suspended respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (iii) based upon uncontested evidence of professional misconduct. Specifically, the Committee presented evidence…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re HoenigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BenzingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re AmukeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API