Legal Opinion

In re Pantoja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*111OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the First Judicial Department on January 14, 1985 and, at all times relevant to the matters herein, maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department. By motion dated February 14, 1994, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order suspending the respondent from the practice of law pending the conclusion of all disciplinary proceedings and until further order of this Court.

In 1991 the Committee began an investigation of the respondent based upon several complaints, which alleged, inter alia,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re SylvanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HoenigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API