Getz v. Robinson

MARSH, District Judge.

Following the verdict1 of the jury on liability in the above entitled actions *765and the judgments entered thereon, the plaintiffs, Mario Ramos and Richard E. Getz, moved for a new trial. The motions will be denied.2

Grounds assigned by both movants for a new trial were that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, and that the actions were improperly consolidated. In addition, Ramos contended that the findings of the jury were inconsistent and improper; that under the special interrogatories submitted to the jury, “the jury was not permitted to consider the possibility of…