Legal Opinion
Guy v. Rudd
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 19, 1972No. Civ. A. Nos. 70-918, 72-33PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL
KNOX, District Judge.
The above actions arose out of an accident involving three tractor-trailer outfits which occurred on September 19, 1968, at approximately 2:00 a.m. on the bridge of the Pennsylvania Turnpike crossing the Allegheny River in Plum Borough, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The bridge has two lanes for westbound traffic and two lanes for eastbound traffic with a medial barrier in the center. At the time of the accident, the bridge was wet and slippery. Prior to the happening of the accident, Rudd had been operating a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McCay v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Francis T. Ratigan v. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commodities, Inc., and the Troy Union Railroad Company, Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guy v. RuddCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Robert L. Guy v. Gordon Willis Rudd, in No. 72-1890. Appeal of Theodore James Wilson and Eastern Stainless Steel Corporation, in No. 72-1889. Theodore Wilson, in Nos. 72-1892, 72-1890 v. Robert L. Guy v. Eastern Stainless Steel Corporation. Appeal of Gordon Willis Rudd and Universal Oil Products Company, in No. 72-1891Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973