Legal Opinion
Krauss v. Greenbarg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 16, 1943No. 8184PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
On July 30, 1940, the defendants who used the business name of King Kard Overall Company, received an award and contract from the War Department of the United States to supply 698,084 pairs of leggings. The contract called for deliveries of certain quantities of leggings at stated intervals and provided for a sum as liquidated damages for each day of delay. By a memorandum of the same date the defendants placed an order with the plaintiff, whose business was carried on under the name of American Cord and Webbing Company, for the webbing to be used in making the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Charles Spence v. Esab Grp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Toyota Industrial Trucks U. S. A., Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Evans City v. Promat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.