Legal Opinion · Dissent

MacDonald v. Skornia

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1948No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 44,014PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Dissent

In this intersection collision case, defendant Albin Skornia has appealed from denials of his motion for a directed verdict, his motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto, and for a new trial. Consequently the facts must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Shank v. Lucker, 296 Mich. 705, and Saunders v. Joseph, 300 Mich. 479.

On September 6, 1941, plaintiff Donald MacDonald, then 65 years of age, was driving his car in a westerly direction on Twenty-first street in the city of Bay City at about 11 o'clock a.m. The day was bright, dry and clear. As he approached Van Buren…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Michaels v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Paton v. StealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Sebring v. MawbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Kalamazoo v. PriestMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Krause v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Christopher v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Vukich v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API