Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Ransom

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1988No. 88S01-8812-CV-1017PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

John L. Ransom appeals the trial court’s refusal to set aside a judgment entered in his absence. He had asserted that he was absent due to mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect under Trial Rule 60(B)(1), Ind. Rules of Procedure. We reverse.

On April 9,1986, the trial court entered a decree dissolving the marriage between John and Judy Ransom. After the dissolution, John’s attorney withdrew to avoid a conflict of interest, and the trial court continued the suit on the other issues. The court allowed a continuance to provide John an opportunity to retain additional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Cantwell v. CantwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cua v. RamosIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fagan v. ROYERIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Gill v. WilkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kmart Corp. v. EnglebrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Moore v. Terre Haute First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. St. Clair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Progressive Insurance Co. v. HargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API