Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2009No. 76S03-0805-CR-215PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Bruce Wayne St. Clair, Jr. pled guilty under a plea agreement that recommended a three-year sentence. The court accepted the plea, approved the agreement, and imposed sentence in accor-danee with it.

St. Clair now asserts that because the plea agreement "recommended" three years, the trial court was authorized to impose any lawful sentence, a sentence subject to further consideration on direct appeal. We hold that it was not. Once the trial court approved the agreement, it was bound to impose the sentence specified in the agreement. There was therefore nothing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tumulty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Houser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dewitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Brightman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Puckett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Tricia A. Davis Williams v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State of Indiana v. Pebble StaffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API