Legal Opinion
Moore v. Terre Haute First National Bank
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1991No. 61A01-9105-CV-137PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Defendant-appellees Terre Haute First National Bank (the Bank), attorney Norman Lowery, and attorney Arnold Brames each secured a dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute under Ind.Trial Rule 41(E) against plaintiff-appellant Michael Moore. 1 Moore timely sought relief from judgment under Ind.Trial Rule 60(B)(1). The trial court denied relief, and Moore now appeals, claiming the trial court erred in denying his motion for T.R. 60(B) relief. We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 16, 1989, Moore and his wife, by counsel Leslie Simpson, initiated this action by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rumfelt v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Fulton v. Van SlykeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. NeumannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. Van KeppelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Baxter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lake County Trust No. 3190 v. Highland Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Adoption of D.C. v. R.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Standard Lumber Co. of St. John, Inc. v. JosevskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Munster Community Hospital v. BernackeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.