Legal Opinion

Pioneer Fuel Co. v. St. Peter Street Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1896No. Nos. 9618, 9838-(46, 47)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeals by defendants Peet and Stark from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., overruling separate demurrers to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

This action is the consolidation of two separate and independent actions, each brought under G-. S. 1894, c. 76, for the appointment of a receiver of the St. Peter Street Improvement Company, a corporation. The plaintiff Merriam recovered a money judgment against this corporation March 1, 1894. Execution was issued, and returned unsatisfied, on the same day; and thereafter, on that day or the next day, he commenced his action for the appointment' of a receiver. The plaintiff Pioneer Fuel Company obtained a money judgment against the same corporation January 30, 1894. Execution was issued, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Tucker v. St. Louis Life Ins.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Arthur v. WilliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Harper v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lumiansky v. TessierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Palmer v. Bank of ZumbrotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Von Cotzhausen v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Goldman v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API