Minneapolis Baseball Co. v. City Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county, in which David €. Bell was appointed receiver of defendant corporation, and Charles D. Whitall and another intervened for the purpose of enforcing the liability of stockholders.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county, in which David €. Bell was appointed receiver of defendant corporation, and Charles D. Whitall and another intervened for the purpose of enforcing the liability of stockholders. From orders, Jamison, J., — one denying the application of intervenors to have the stockholders brought in as defendants, and required to answer their amended complaint, and another granting the application of the receiver for leave to file a supplemental complaint, and requiring the stockholders to be made parties defendant and to answer the same, — the intervenors…
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This action was originally commenced against the defendant bank alone, on January 15, 1896, under the provisions of G. S. 1894, c. 76, for the sequestration of its assets, and the appointment of a receiver. On the following day, the appellants herein filed their cross bill or complaint, as creditors of the bank, seeking thereby to enforce the double liability of its stockholders for its debts, alleging therein a cause of action against them, and naming them as parties defendants. The appellants then moved the court for an order joining the stockholders as defendants and requiring them to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Allen v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. LangdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Arthur v. WilliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- McKusick v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hanson v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Colton v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Finney v. GuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Hale v. HardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- Converse v. AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.