Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Wilber, J. Case by Mary Buckley against the Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages for injuries received by her upon a street railroad *584crossing. The circuit judge directed a verdict in favor, of the defendant, upon the ground that the negligence of plaintiff was such that she was not entitled to recover. It is claimed by plaintiff:

First. That the question of the negligence of the plaintiff was for the jury.

Second. That, even though the negligence of plaintiff contributed to her injury, she was entitled to recover, because of the gross negligence of defendant.

The record shows that, at the time of the injury, 12 tracks of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Greany v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Oxenger v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hampel v. Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Simon v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API