Legal Opinion

Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1915PublishedCited by 47 opinions

PROM SCOTT Appeal from the Criminal and Law Court of Scott County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and hy certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. —Sen Hicks, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This is an action of damages for personal injuries sustained hy Todd, the plaintiff below, by reason of his being struck by cars of defendant company at a public crossing.

The trial judge in the circuit court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant railway company, but on appeal the court of civil appeals held that there was sufficient evidence adduced by the plaintiff to take the case to the jury. The cause is before us for review on peti*96tion for and grant of the writ of certiorari, and it has been argued at the bar of this court.

The accident occurred at Robbins, a small station on the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Chunn v. City & Suburban R. Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Rider v. Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Grigsby & Co. v. BrattonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Street v. CalvertTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stagner v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Chattanooga Station Co. v. HarperTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Evansville Container Corporation v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Tennessee Central Railway v. LedbetterTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API