Legal Opinion

Besser v. Ooms

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 4, 1946No. 8981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s bill to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to grant a patent1 was *18dismissed by the District Court. The appealed claims of appellant’s application relaté to printing or “imprinting,” on the ■face of a check, a facsimile signature of ■the payee. Appellant prints this facsimile across the right-hand end of the check. If the check is folded endwise after it has been endorsed, the endorsement can readily 'be compared with the facsimile. Patton Patent No. 1,367,754 uses a handwritten .specimen signature for the same purpose of comparison with the endorsement, and in practically the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  5. Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Gustav Schafer v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, Herbert Bestian v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. Aero-Mecaniques v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  5. Broderson v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API