Broderson v. Marzall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Dissent
*143WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge
(dissenting) .
I regret the necessity of dissenting in this case. The right of an inventor to a patent was a subject of express constitutional concern, Article I, § 8, and has long been safeguarded by congressional legislation. In our own day, the obtaining of an important patent is one of the few remaining ways in which an individual can by intellectual and scientific endeavor obtain substantial monetary rewards. The encouragement of inventive activity is a function not only of the Patent Office hut of the courts; neither should be reluctant to recognize a real…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.