Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 27, 1950No. 10026_1PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

The Standard Oil Development Company appeals from a judgment of the United States' District Court for the District of Columbia which dismissed its complaint, filed under Rev.Stat. § 4915, 35 U.S.C. § 63 (1946), 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, praying for a decree that the Commissioner of Patents allow certain claims for a patent. Appellant is assignee of Theodore A. Huber, the original applicant. Prior to institution of the action in the District Court the claims had been passed upon in the Patent Office by the Primary Examiner and on appeal from his decision by the Board of Appeals,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  2. L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Associated Plastics Companies, Inc. v. Gits Molding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. Larsen v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. Shell Development Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API