People v. Eitzen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*256Opinion
SIMS, J.
The People have appealed (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1)) from a decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Penal Code section 995, four counts of a six-count amended information. It is concluded that the three issues raised by the parties must be resolved as follows: the prosecutor was not precluded from charging four counts of grand theft because the magistrate failed to hold the defendant to answer three of those charges; the uncontradicted evidence produced at the preliminary hearing'was sufficient to show reasonable and probable cause to hold the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Skelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. HodgsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- People v. SwinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.