Legal Opinion

People v. Eitzen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1974No. Crim. 12392PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*256Opinion

SIMS, J.

The People have appealed (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1)) from a decision granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Penal Code section 995, four counts of a six-count amended information. It is concluded that the three issues raised by the parties must be resolved as follows: the prosecutor was not precluded from charging four counts of grand theft because the magistrate failed to hold the defendant to answer three of those charges; the uncontradicted evidence produced at the preliminary hearing'was sufficient to show reasonable and probable cause to hold the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Skelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  5. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HodgsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. People v. SwinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API