Legal Opinion

State v. Burnhannan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 31, 1994No. 12177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and sentenc*538ing him to serve the suspended portion of his original sentence. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to admit three letters from a psychiatrist treating the defendant, (2) showed bias against the defendant, (3) misconstrued a statement made by a witness, and (4) denied the defendant’s motion for a new hearing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

After pleading guilty to sexual assault in the fourth degree and risk of injury to a child, the defendant was sentenced to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Kubeck v. Foremost Foods Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drew v. K-Mart Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. State v. StricklandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Small v. Stop & Shop Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API