Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Shufflin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1923No. 11321PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as in the court below. Plaintiff and defendant M. B. Shufflin each became the owner of a one-fourth interest in an oil and gas lease on the so-called Guord allotment in Nowata county in consideration of drilling a well thereon, on terms hereinafter referred to. The other defendants were the owners of an oil and gas lease on the so-called Welch allotment, adjoining the Guord allotment on the east. After plaintiff and defendant M. B. Shufflin had drilled the Guord well, plaintiff sued Shufflin and tire sther defendants herein, who were the owners…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Municipal Paving Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Dunham v. LoverockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Taylor v. Enid National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Neill v. ShamburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. McKay v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. White v. A. C. Houston Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Wammack v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. McAnally v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API