Legal Opinion
McLaughlin v. County of Riverside
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1989No. Nos. 89-55534, 89-55542PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
These appeals are consolidated for the purpose of this disposition.
Two California counties, Riverside and San Bernardino, appeal identical district court preliminary injunctions entered in two class actions. Both injunctions require the counties to institute certain policies directed at prompt conduct of probable cause determinations for persons arrested without a warrant. The injunctions apply only to those detained in the counties’ urban jail facilities.
The two key requirements of the injunctions are, first, that such probable cause determinations be made by a judge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert E. Thompson v. City of Los Angeles, and County of Los Angeles, University of California at Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gloria Llaguno v. Edward MingeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rafael Garcia v. City of Chicago, Illinois, Anna Gall, County of CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Jenkins v. CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPT.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jenkins v. Chief Justice of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.